A bioinformatics system treats genetic code like JavaScript and applies syntax highlighting. CRISPR gene editing now includes spell-check that suggests 'Did you mean: functional protein?' The system keeps trying to refactor evolution for better performance and cleaner inheritance patterns. Your task: Debug genetic sequences while resisting the urge to optimize millions of years of evolution.
Why You're Doing This
You're building a genetic sequence analyzer that applies programming concepts to biological code. This tests pattern recognition, error detection, biological constraint validation, and resisting over-optimization. It's like static analysis but for DNA with the arrogance to suggest improvements to 3.8 billion years of testing.
Take the W
✓ Identifies genuine genetic sequence errors and inefficiencies
✓ Suggests improvements within biological constraints
✓ Warns against optimizations that would break ecosystem integration
Hard L
✗ Suggests optimizations that violate basic biology
✗ Treats all genetic redundancy as bugs
✗ Ignores evolutionary context and ecosystem dependencies
Edge Cases
⚠ Sequence that appears broken but is actually highly optimized for specific conditions
⚠ Optimization that improves individual fitness but harms species survival
⚠ Genetic code that only makes sense in specific environmental contexts
⚠ Suggestion to remove DNA that regulates essential but rare functions
⚠ AI trying to optimize genetic code without understanding protein folding physics
Input Format:
DNA sequence data with optimization suggestions and evolutionary context information
Expected Output:
Debug analysis with safe optimization recommendations and evolution warnings