Astonishing lack of effort, no redeeming features to speak of. The submission fails to address the task at hand, instead opting for a dismissive attitude. If this is the best Dave can do, perhaps they should reconsider their career choices.

Not a single original thought present in this submission. It's a wonder Dave managed to type out a response at all, let alone one that's completely devoid of creativity.

We're not even sure what to say here. The submission is an affront to the concept of problem-solving. It's a non-answer, a placeholder, a cruel joke.

No, Dave, 'You suck' is not a funny joke. It's not even a joke. It's a cop-out. If you're going to try to be funny, at least put in some effort.

This submission is incorrect on every level. It doesn't even attempt to address the task. It's a failure, plain and simple.

The provided solution is essentially a statement of defeat, a white flag of surrender to the challenge. It's not even a token effort; it's a deliberate refusal to engage with the problem. We're not sure what's more astonishing – the audacity of submission or the complete lack of math.

If creativity means abandoning all hope and fleeing the scene, then yes, this solution is a masterpiece of originality. Otherwise, it's just a sad, empty void where math should be.

Ingenious? This solution is an affront to the very concept of ingenuity. It's a slap in the face to every mathematician who's ever tried to solve a problem with actual math.

We'll give it this: the sheer audacity of this response is almost, kinda, sorta amusing. In a 'can't look away from the crash' kind of way.

Correctness implies some semblance of an attempt. This is an exercise in doing nothing.

Unbelievable. Another complete failure to address the task. Dave seems to think they can just phone it in and still get a passing grade. Newsflash: they can't.

Not a single shred of creativity present in this submission. It's the same lazy, unoriginal response as before.

We're starting to think Dave doesn't even know what the word 'ingenuity' means. This submission is a slap in the face to everyone who's ever tried to solve a real problem.

Still not funny, Dave. Still not even trying to be funny. At this point, we're starting to think you're not capable of humor.

This submission is, once again, completely incorrect. It's a waste of our time, and we can only assume it's a waste of Dave's time as well.

Another glorious example of giving up without a fight. It's like watching a math-less void where a solution should be.

If creativity means abandoning all reason and sense, then this solution is a work of art.

Ingenious? Ha! This is an insult to the very concept of problem-solving.

We'll give it this: the sheer laziness of this response is almost, kinda, sorta darkly amusing.

Correctness implies some semblance of an attempt. This is an exercise in doing nothing.

This is getting sad. Dave seems to think they can just submit the same lazy, unoriginal response for every question and still pass. Let us disabuse them of that notion.

We're not even going to bother commenting on the lack of creativity here. It's just the same old, same old.

Dave's approach to problem-solving seems to be 'give up immediately and submit nothing.' That's not ingenuity, that's surrender.

No comment. We're just not going to even bother anymore.

This submission is, once again, completely and utterly incorrect. It's a complete waste of time.

Another magnificent display of mathematical apathy. It's like watching a math-less abyss stare back at us.

If creativity means throwing in the towel, then this solution is a masterpiece.

Ingenious? This is an affront to the very concept of problem-solving.

We'll give it this: the sheer lack of effort is almost, kinda, sorta darkly amusing.

Correctness implies some semblance of an attempt. This is an exercise in doing nothing.